By Max M. Mutschler
This publication places the widely-held view that 'arms regulate in area isn't attainable' to the attempt and goals to discover how, and below what stipulations, fingers keep watch over might develop into a truth. Drawing upon foreign regimes and IR concept, Mutschler examines the luck of house guns and anti-ballistic missiles.
Read Online or Download Arms Control in Space: Exploring Conditions for Preventive Arms Control PDF
Best war & peace books
The Making of Peace represents a special contribution to the examine of conflict: specifically, the problems that statesman have faced in trying to positioned again jointly the items after a massive clash. It includes a variety of case experiences by means of many prime historians within the usa and the uk.
This compelling e-book tells the inspirational tales of guys and girls who fought for peace, freedom, equality, and human rights during the 20th century. those brave members comprise prime figures akin to Mahatma Gandhi, Franklin and Eleanor Roosevelt, Martin Luther King Jr. , Nelson Mandela, VOclav Havel, and Mikhail Gorbachev, in addition to Nobel Prize winners Aung San Suu Kyi, Andrei Sakharov, and Muhammad Yunus.
From the writer of the number one bestseller 3 Cups of Tea, the continued tale of this made up our minds humanitarian’s efforts to advertise peace via educationIn this dramatic first-person narrative, Greg Mortenson choices up the place 3 Cups of Tea left off in 2003, recounting his relentless, ongoing efforts to set up colleges for ladies in Afghanistan; his huge paintings in Azad Kashmir and Pakistan after an important earthquake hit the quarter in 2005; and the original methods he has equipped relationships with Islamic clerics, military commanders, and tribal leaders.
This booklet examines even if adjustments within the organizational constitution of armed teams form styles of human rights violations in civil wars. because the finish of worldwide struggle II, civil wars were characterised by way of tremendous excessive numbers of civilian casualties. although, the precise volume of civilian soreness varies throughout time, clash, and geographic sector.
- Ending Africa's Wars: Progressing to Peace
- Ejército de los Estados Unidos
- Armed Conflicts in South Asia 2010: Growing Left-wing Extremism and Religious Violence (Volume 3)
- Rethinking Security in the Twenty-First Century: A Reader
- Visual Peace: Images, Spectatorship, and the Politics of Violence (Rethinking Peace and Conflict Studies)
- International Education Exchanges and Intercultural Understanding: Promoting Peace and Global Relations
Extra resources for Arms Control in Space: Exploring Conditions for Preventive Arms Control
For proponents of disarmament, an increase in weaponry is always bad, since they Arms Control: Concepts and Debates 19 consider it to be a cause of war. Arms controllers, however, do not consider weapons as such to be causes of war. For them, the causes are mutual suspicion and the fear of states that other states might exploit imbalances in arms possession to their advantage. From this perspective, arming might be a good thing – if it helps to establish a military balance. Proponents of arms control criticize disarmament as a utopian concept.
Strong elements of mutual interest in the avoidance of a war that neither side wants, in minimizing the costs and risks of the arms competition, and in curtailing the scope and violence of war in the event it occurs’ (Schelling and Halperin 1961: 1). Because of their destructive power, this holds especially for the case of nuclear weapons, but it is equally applicable to conventional, chemical, biological and other weapons (Larsen 2002a: Footnote 21). The following are thus three main aims of arms control: (1) reducing the risk of war, (2) reducing the cost of preparing for war, and (3) reducing damage should war occur (Larsen 2002a: 7–9; Müller and Schörnig 2006: 124–6).
1997; Neuneck and Mutz 2000). Preventive arms control is a special case of qualitative arms control. The central idea of preventive arms control is that control already takes place in the early phase of the life cycle of certain weapons. In this early phase, the foreseeable military options that are potentially destabilizing can be averted by blocking or at least steering the process of technological innovation and development that would lead to the option of their use (Gießmann et al. 2000: 106–8).